Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Akeidas Achnai

How come it was right for Abraham to heed God's voice over the halacha, but wrong for the Amoraim in the famous talmudic story of the Oven of Achnai?

3 comments:

  1. How about this: God commanded Avraham to sacrifice his son. But in the Achnai story, a bat kol simply stated that R Eliezer was correct; there was no command to follow R Eliezer's view.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't buy that. The heavenly voice stated that the halacha (or halakha if you're academic) is in accordance with R Eliezer. If we are commanded to follow halacha, and halacha is like R Eliezer...
    if A = B and B = C, A = C. Unless of course God never commanded us to follow halacha.

    ReplyDelete
  3. True, but why didn't the bas kol simply say -"You should all follow Rabbi Eliezer's view!"?

    A different approach: Prophecy, which Avraham experienced, is very different from a Bas Kol. Prophecy is a direct encounter, a clear cut message from God (I know all the traditions we have that Avraham wasn;t dure, etc. - but stick with pshat for now). A prophecy, perhaps, is enough to override the general rule prohibiting murder.

    A bas kol, however, is not a direct message from God. How exactly it is different? I can't say for sure, but it is more in the realm of "Oznecha tishma davar me'acharecha" (Isaiah) - we hear hear messages from 'behind', unclearly. Tosfos explain that a bas kol is an echo. By definition, an echo is not as clear as a diret message. And an echo is not enough to override a clear halachic principle - follow the majority.

    ReplyDelete